Guidance on accommodating children in need and their families
It is true, as Mr Mc Guire points out, that the 2002 Order assumes that there will be some homeless 16 or 17 year olds who are not owed a duty under section 20.But that is a very different thing from saying that there are children who are not owed a duty under section 20 because they are or may be owed a duty under the 1996 Act. The 2002 Order takes out of priority need those children who require accommodation in the circumstances set out in section 20(1).
The materials are posted 24 hours prior to the session when available. Allowances and Financial Support to Kinship Carers 14. In Scotland, as in other cultures, family and friends have always played an important role in supporting parents and their children at times of crisis. This should include an identified lead within the local authority for developing policy and monitoring progress.When there is a steady stream of documentation shared there can be an increase of family engagement.When educators analyze the documentation and the views of others including parents, children, […]Full Description Sponsored by Kindermusik as part of the Setting the Stage for a Lifetime of Learning Webinar Series Music holds an exceptionally fascinating place in our development as human beings.
They cannot in the same breath be put back into priority need by adjudging that they do not require accommodation at all when clearly they do. The only way to break out of that circle (recognised by Anthony Edward-Stuart QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge in R (A) v Coventry City Council  EWHC 34 (Admin)) is to read into section 20(1) the words under this section after requires accommodation".